Alabama Senate Committee Approves Gambling Expansion

Del Marsh believes gambling revenues will be the most useful way to balance Alabama’s spending plan.

An Alabama casino gambling bill narrowly passed through committee a week ago, offering the legislation the chance to be heard by the complete State Senate.

The bill, known as SB 453, passed through the Tourism and Marketing Committee by a five to three vote on Thursday.

The bill is designed to help produce new income for the state in two ways.

First, it would create a state lottery that might be regulated by an Alabama Lottery and Gaming Commission.

Bill Will Allow for Four Casinos

Perhaps more dramatically, that commission would additionally be charged with overseeing the introduction of casino gambling in the state.

Such operations would be allowed at four horse racing tracks through the state, the time that is first games like slots, blackjack, as well as other dining table games could be permitted within the state.

The bill, which would amend hawaii constitution, ended up being introduced earlier in the day this by Senate President Del Marsh (R-Anniston) month. He said that aided by the state needing an influx of revenue, he would rather see that money come through legalized gambling than using a tax increase.

‘This is a huge bit of legislation, a very piece that is controversial’ Marsh stated at a general public hearing regarding the bill held Tuesday. ‘But I think it is an option that should be put here as a choice to greatly help try to fix some of the budget problems in this state.’

Many Miss Electronic Bingo Casinos

During those hearings, there was impassioned testimony from all relative sides regarding the issue. Many people spoke of attempting to see the return of video gaming to facilities that once had it, before so-called electronic bingo casinos were closed down in the state following an Alabama Supreme Court ruling year that is last.

‘I’ve seen good hardworking individuals doing without, getting close to hungry,’ stated Macon County hardware store owner Brent Thomas, who said that his area was indeed hurt tremendously by the closure regarding the VictoryLand bingo casino.

Meanwhile, others argued against any video gaming expansion, saying that all of the cash that the state made through the games would be coming from poor people.

‘It is a tax,’ stated Joe Godfrey, executive director associated with the Alabama Citizens Action Project. ‘It’s a tax regarding the poor. It preys on the people who can least manage to pay it.’

Indigenous American Casinos Active in State

Still others pointed out that there was already gaming in the continuing state, as the Poarch Band of Creek Indians currently operate three casinos with electronic bingo machines in Alabama.

That, Marsh said, meant the decision ended up beingn’t between having gambling or not, but rather whether the continuing state would gather revenue from the gambling that was occurring.

Are you aware that Poarch Band, they do say that the bill that is newn’t contain enough rules about precisely what would be allowed during the race tracks where gambling would be allowed, that could leave loopholes that operators will endeavour to exploit.

‘It’s like handing your teenager a bank card with no rules attached and then being astonished when you have a bill that looks like the Alabama budget deficit,’ said Robert McGhee, treasurer associated with Poarch Band of Creek Indians Tribal Council. ‘It’s a backwards thinking that opens the door to potentially irresponsible methods that is hard to rein in following the fact.’

The bill would enable for casino gambling at race songs in Birmingham, Macon, mobile phone and Greene County. Proponents say that gambling expansion could create over $400 million in new revenue and 11,000 jobs for hawaii.

In an effort to approve a noticeable modification to the state constitution to permit for gambling, three-fifths of the legislature would need to straight back the bill, as would a majority of voters in circumstances referendum.

New Form Of Connecticut Casino Bill To See Voting This Week

The Mohegan Sun is one of two gambling enterprises in Connecticut wary of the latest competition from Massachusetts and New York. (Image:

Connecticut desperately wants to find a method to battle straight back up against the coming casino expansion in Massachusetts and New York.

This it seems as though the state Senate will consider a bill that would do just that week.

A brand new version of the Connecticut casino bill is slated to be voted on by their state’s Senate, and would allow the state’s two casino operating Indian tribes to build a resort that is new go along side the two they currently run.

The bill appears to be much smaller than in earlier variations: rather compared to a bill that is 16-page had been previously under consideration, The Hartford Courant says that the working draft for the brand new legislation is 75 pages very long, or around three pages.

First Version Allowed for Three Gambling Enterprises

In previous versions of proposed casino legislation, Connecticut might have allowed for as many as three new casinos to be operated by the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan tribes, which operate Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun, respectively. Into the version that is newest, only one extra casino could be allowed.

That new casino could potentially be built any place in the state, and the bill outlines a procedure that would let the two tribes to talk to towns enthusiastic about making proposals to host the facility.

However, it would be located somewhere into the I-91 corridor north of Hartford, where it might potentially limit the loss in gambling income that could possibly be caused by the MGM that is upcoming Springfield Massachusetts.

There have already been several towns in that area that have expressed an interest in attracting a casino. Possible suitors could include East Windsor and East Hartford, among others.

Massachusetts Casinos Could Eat Into Income

Both Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods are gravely concerned about the impact that is potential of Massachusetts casinos, which in turn concerns lawmakers, as the state shares in the slot machine revenue at both resorts.

At one point, their state made up to $430 million from that compact in 2007; that quantity dropped to simply under $280 million in 2014, and some projections have that total falling to as low as $189 million in 2018.

Under the new form of the bill, last authorization for the new casino would occur until 2016, as the General Assembly will have to accept any deal that has been made between the tribes and a town or city.

‘It became clear it had to be much more of a process that is two-step’ Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff (D-Norwalk) told the Connecticut Mirror. ‘It could not be achieved in a single bill.’

Tribal leaders appears pleased using the brand new bill, even if it does not provide the immediate effect they might have hoped for.

‘ Our goal from the outset has been to protect the 9,300 jobs and revenue that will be lost to competition on Connecticut’s borders, and this bill is believed by us, if authorized, will give the Mohegan and Mashantucket Pequot Tribes the ability to start to take action to do so,’ said Patty McQueen, a spokesperson for the two tribes.

However, it’s also possible that there might be numerous questions that are legal hang over the legislation, a prospect that Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen raised earlier this year. The bill also appears to anticipate the possibility for legal challenges, stating in one part that when a court ‘holds any supply with this section unconstitutional, the remaining provisions of the part shall be inoperative and possess no effect.’

Deutsche Bank Report Says New Jersey Should Open Casinos Beyond Atlantic City

The Meadowlands could be home to a casino if New Jersey allows gambling outside of Atlantic City. (Image: John Munson/The Star-Ledger)

New Jersey has toyed with the thought of opening a casino into the northern part associated with the state, a move that would mark the first time gambling enterprises in their state had spread beyond Atlantic City.

That effort might get more help carrying out a report by Deutsche Bank that says this kind of casino could possibly be what New Jersey needs.

Deutsche Bank analyst Andrew Zarnett filed a report last week that took a general look at the New Jersey gaming industry, and found so it will be within the state’s interest that is best to build at least one casino in northern New Jersey, perhaps at the Meadowlands.

‘We believe that one or two casinos in north Jersey could generate well over $500 million, putting ~$275 million into their state’s coffers and thus is a move that is smart the state,’ Zarnett wrote. ‘It’s good from a budgetary place and also for Atlantic City, so long as some of the tax revenues go back to that market.’

Talk of Brand New Casino Intensifies

The topic of putting a casino at the Meadowlands or elsewhere in northern New Jersey heated up year that is last as some lawmakers seemed forward to possibly broaching the issue at the end of 2015 or in 2016.

In February 2011, Governor Chris Christie put an unofficial five-year hang on such talks in order to give the city’s video gaming industry time to enhance with no pressure of another local casino potentially cannibalizing the market.

In particular, Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D-Gloucester) said year that is last it may be possible to put up a statewide referendum on building new gambling enterprises elsewhere in the state in November 2015. Zarnett talked to this possibility in their report.

‘It is our belief that a ballot question to allow video gaming outside of Atlantic City could come this 15,’ he wrote november.

Voter Turnout Concerns

However, supporters of such a move may never be looking to hold the vote so quickly. Based on Sweeney, the expected reduced voter turnout in an off 12 months for elections could harm the measure, as voters from Atlantic City and nearby areas could be more motivated to turn out and vote against it than voters from the north the main state are to support it.

That could mean holding the vote off until November 2016, when a presidential election will guarantee a higher percentage of New Jersey adults head to your polls. But other people who are in support of the casino expansion nevertheless desire to experience a vote this present year.

‘ We now have doing it now, so we don’t fall even further and further behind other states,’ said State Senator Ray Lesniak (D-Union County). ‘Atlantic City continues to decrease, and racing shall continue to decrease. This could very well be our last possibility.’

Deutsche Bank Expects More Closures

The Deutsche Bank report also painted a grim outlook for Atlantic City’s gambling enterprises, projecting that gaming revenues in the city would fall to about $1.8 billion in 2017 due to increased gaming choices in surrounding states. That may mean casino that is further in the a long time.

‘ We might expect Taj Mahal and a Boardwalk that is second casino join the list of shuttered properties in the outer years,’ Zarnett had written.

The report’s conclusion is straightforward, and one that supporters of a north Jersey casino shall be happy to quote.

‘In summation, it’s time for New Jersey to push ahead with plans for a North Jersey casino or casinos,’ Zarnett published. ‘And as a result, we think that the step that is next a constitutional referendum this November providing approval for gaming outside of Atlantic City.’